Sitting on the Fence

 


Sitting on the Fence



Centrism, unlike defined ideologies like socialism or conservatism, is harder to pin down because it emphasizes pragmatism and compromise, varying with context. While this balance appeals to some, it often seems less compelling to voters seeking clear-cut solutions. Extremes have stronger emotional appeal, making them easier to rally behind, and centrism struggle to clearly define its ideals can make it feel vague. In today’s political climate, media and social media further amplify extreme voices, leaving centrist views overshadowed, despite their focus on moderation and inclusivity.


People often say centrists are just sitting on the fence, but I see it more as getting a better view of both sides. 

It’s not about avoiding decisions, it’s about weighing options and finding solutions that work. Sure, we may not dive headfirst into extremes, but someone has to keep the balance, right? Instead of fighting from one end, I would rather build a bridge in the middle and get everyone to meet halfway. So, if sitting on the fence means getting things done, I will bring a cushion for sure.


When it comes to addressing rape, I believe we need strong, balanced solutions. Rather than uttering “Castration” or “Capital punishment”, we need tougher laws to ensure rapists are prosecuted and face real consequences, as a short-term solution. Meanwhile, “Education on consent” and “Sex education” for young ones should be our primary focus as the long-term solution.

At the same time, due process must be upheld, ensuring the accused are treated fairly. For survivors, we have to provide immediate access to mental health support, and legal aid, and protect them from further trauma. This issue demands serious action through law, education, and support, we can start making real change.


When it comes to the Israel-Palestine issue, fully acknowledging Israel’s right to security and the Palestinian right to self-determination, while being firm in condemning violence on all sides. As Mahatma Gandhi rightly pointed out,” An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.”

I believe in showing empathy for the civilians caught in this conflict and recognizing the historical grievances both communities carry, without assigning blame to just one side. The two-state solution seems like the most realistic path to peace, with human rights, diplomacy, and international mediation at the forefront. Extremism has no place here, dialogue and compromise are what will lead to a lasting resolution.


In terms of LGBTQIA+ rights, we have to fully support the dignity and equality of LGBTQIA+ individuals and their right to live openly without fear of discrimination. At the same time, I understand that cultural and religious concerns shape different views, and I think real societal harmony goes beyond just passing laws, it requires dialogue. The path forward isn’t in radical confrontation or rigid conservatism; it’s about creating a space where human rights and personal beliefs can respectfully coexist. It’s a delicate balance, but with empathy and pragmatism, I’m convinced that everyone deserves their place in society.


When it comes to religion, I think atheists and religious folks can coexist, after all, we’re all stuck on the same planet. For me, it’s all about mutual respect and letting everyone express their beliefs without turning it into a shouting match. A little open dialogue never hurt anyone, right? I am purposely not mentioning science here, because If you know, YOU KNOW


I’m all for secular governance because it keeps things fair, making sure laws don’t pick favourites. But I also appreciate the cultural and ethical contributions religions bring to the table. In the end, we’ve all got common values, compassion, justice, and community. Why not focus on what unites us? If we can agree on those, atheists and religious people can get along just fine. We’ve got enough reasons to argue; let’s keep this one off the list!


In India’s political landscape, I see centrism as the art of steering a car through a road full of potholes and speed bumps. The BJP? Well, they’re all about nationalism and economic growth, but sometimes it feels like they’re driving with one hand on the wheel and one eye in the rearview mirror. Congress, once the smooth driver of centrism, now feels like that old car you inherited .It’s reliable but needs some serious upgrades to keep up with traffic. The Communist Party? They’re still trying to push a bullock cart in a Formula 1 race . social justice is great, but rigid economics? But in Kerala, living on Debt?? 

AAP comes in like the new kid on the block with their transparency and welfare, but they can sometimes get lost in the city limits. And do you really think freebees can save them??


Then we have got the regional parties, the local mechanics of our political vehicle—whether it’s DMK in Tamil Nadu, TMC in West Bengal, RJD in Bihar or Shiv Sena in Maharashtra. They do wonders for their local scenes, but sometimes they’re so focused on their turf, that they forget we’re all driving the same car across the country.


For me, centrism is like being the designated driver, taking the best from all sides, economic growth, social justice, local governance, and good leadership, without swerving too far in any direction. It’s about keeping the vehicle on the road, bridging the divides, and making sure we all get home safely, without anyone throwing up in the backseat.


In conclusion, centrist thinking is like finding the perfect middle seat,while the extremes are fighting for the window or the aisle, We are just trying to make the flight smooth for everyone. Extremes love to stir up conflict, but centrists focus on dialogue, understanding, and finding common ground. We might not have the loudest voices, but we’re the ones making sure everyone gets where they’re going, together. In the end, centrism is about progress that works for all, and keeping things calm enough so no one’s pressing the emergency exit mid-flight.

So, sitting on the fence isn’t about indecision,it’s about finding balance and understanding in a world full of noise!











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Carl and Ann

Grey